Archive for February, 2010


Call Failed… again… and again… and again…

Having just finished my most recent iPhone conversation with my mother – a phone call that failed 4 times – I am reaching my limit with a device that is grossly misnamed. It really should be called the iGadget, because its performance as a telephone is absurd. Apple has NO business giving Adobe a hard time about its Flash player, calling it a buggy “dead technology” when Apple can’t even get it’s alleged phone to work like a phone. If the failed calls are Apple’s fault… then Apple needs to own it and fix it before calling out Adobe for alleging that Flash is a buggy “old technology.” If the failed calls are AT&T’s fault, then they have no business charging their current rates for a network that is unacceptably substandard. Further, AT&T should sever its exclusive contract with Apple for claiming to provide a service it clearly cannot handle.

[youtube]RdKbYM-oPBg[/youtube]

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm

Going Electric… With a Braun

Dieter Rams design

I recently pulled a Dylan and went electric.  I’d been using disposable razors for years, relying on those inexpensive 10-pack single-blade disposables from Duane Reade.  My skin has always been extremely sensitive, making daily shaving torturous, no matter what the razor or cream. And Gillette has gone so far with whatever Mach they’re on (5 blades?) with a design so pumped that it looks ridiculous.  So I went on a hunt for the same type of electric that my father got me when I graduated from high school: the classic Braun electric shaver.

My original Braun (1989) was similar to the original Dieter Rams design for Braun. It was smart and simple design that fit comfortably in the hand during a shave. The design was in perfect keeping with Dieter Rams’ 10 principles for good design:

  1. Good design is innovative
  2. Good design makes a product useful
  3. Good design is aesthetic
  4. Good design makes a product understandable
  5. Good design is unobtrusive
  6. Good design is honest
  7. Good design is long-lasting
  8. Good design is thorough, down to the last detail
  9. Good design is environmentally friendly

The result was a pretty close shave without the burn, all with a tool that was easy to use and easy on the eyes.

2010 Series 1 design

Unfortunately, the sexy simplicity of Rams’ design was nowhere to be found. In keeping with the design of so many things in our current cultural climate, the Braun series of shavers has sadly gone the way of so much “now” design, like cars (SUVs), furniture, clothes, tits, lips, hair and even websites, i.e. pumped-up, over-thought and over-produced. The end result is like an aging heartthrob, desperately trying to look so very young, so very hot, so very right now.

While I’m perfectly happy with the shave that I get from my new $44 Braun Series 1 shaver, I look at it and see a design that is just trying way too hard.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm

The Aesthetic

Using still photographs I took, along with my own voiceover, I essentially created a slideshow that outlines my aesthetic and what turns me on in terms of design. I love my job, but my favorite part of the gig is actually designing [which, as any web designer will tell you, is not always the biggest slice of the project pie...].

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm

Tom Ford

Back in December, Tom Ford appeared on NPR’s Fresh Air with Terry Gross. Ford was an extremely interesting interview, touching upon the choices he made when writing, directing and designing his debut film The Single Man.

Even more interesting – prompted by Terry Gross’s questions – he details his theories behind his debut collection for the nearly bankrupt Gucci in 1994 and the ensuing provocative ad campaigns. Ford’s views on sex and sexuality in a given cultural climate in our country are right on. And when he talks about the grotesque “pumped up” monsters we’re creating today at the gym, at the plastic surgeon and at the auto manufacturers, he nails it on the head.

Enjoy this extremely interesting interview with an extremely interesting man…

Listen to the interview with Tom Ford on Fresh Air

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm

Bad Bond

The older Bond films have always been a kitschy bit of business, with the hilarious gadgets, the ridiculous Bond girl names (Honey Rider, Pussy Galore, Holly Goodhead), the even more ridiculous Bond girl acting, and the misogynistic ass-patting humor. From this kitschy vintage Bond oeuvre, I’ve always preferred the Connery Bond (except Never Say Never Again, the 1983 Thunderball remake misfire starring a young Kim Basinger).

The Roger Moore Bond has eluded my interest. Moore was certainly debonaire, suave and always winkin’ at us, but he wasn’t hot, like Connery. Also, Connery was someone you wanted to be. Moore was rather someone you just wanted to observe, sort of. But last night, I was in the mood to revisit what I’d been avoiding for so long.

I hadn’t seen a Moore Bond in some years. I think the last one I saw was A View To A Kill in 1985, Moore’s last in the series, starring Christopher Walken and Grace Jones. On Apple TV, most of the Bond canon is available to rent in standard definition or HD. I decided to rent Moonraker in HD, since I hadn’t seen it since it was in the theaters back in 1979. I can sum up the experience in one word: ridonkulous.

The wheels had come off the Bond franchise by this point. The world domination plot was dumb. The faux dominatrix girls were dumber. There was absolutely nothing to take seriously in this movie. The re-experience of Moonraker was an all-out, over-the-top, totally boob-o-licious comedy, with Bond babe scenery chewing that made the Austin Powers trilogy seem subdued. (Though I do have to give credit to Michael Lonsdale for a cool and nuanced performance as the villain, Hugo Drax.) Words completely fail me as I try to come up with a way to describe what this film asks us to take seriously. Several times throughout the film, I found myself giggling to myself ‘you’ve got to be effing kidding me.’

As a huge fan of the Bond idea, starting with Dr. No in 1962 and ending with Connery’s last in 1971, Diamonds Are Forever, I was blown away by Casino Royale in 2006. Though critics didn’t like its follow-up, Quantum of Solace, I thought it was rough, sexy, raw and even smarter than Casino Royale, giving Bond some very heavy weight to carry. Daniel Craig and the team behind him have taken it to a whole new level, giving Bond a tough visceral urgency akin to the Bourne series. For the first time as a decades-long Bond fan, I almost have sympathy for the character and what he goes through as a man. And Judi Dench? I always loved Bernard Lee as the original M. and his dismissive treatment of 007, but Dame Judi gives M. a whole new shade, getting better with each turn.

All that said… I’m sticking with Connery and Craig so far.  The rest?  Not so much.

I’m anxious to see what Bond #23 will bring us in 2011…

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm

Copyright © George Hahn | Powered by WordPress.